Titanic II (2010) Movie Review
Titanic II (2010), directed by Shane Van Dyke, is a low-budget disaster film produced by The Asylum, notorious for its mockbusters. Despite its title, it’s not a sequel to James Cameron’s 1997 epic but a standalone story capitalizing on the Titanic name. Set on the 100th anniversary of the original Titanic’s voyage, the film follows a modern luxury liner, Titanic II, which embarks on a reverse route from New York to Southampton. The plot hinges on a global warming-induced tsunami that propels an iceberg into the ship’s path, leading to a predictable disaster.
The film’s premise is intriguing but falters in execution. The special effects are subpar, with CGI that feels dated even for 2010, often compared unfavorably to video game cutscenes. Scenes shot on the RMS Queen Mary, standing in for Titanic II, are marred by continuity errors, such as fluctuating funnel counts and visible rust on a supposedly new ship. The screenplay, also penned by Van Dyke, leans heavily on disaster movie clichés: a rich playboy protagonist (Van Dyke himself), an estranged couple reuniting, and a heavy-handed global warming message backed by questionable science, like an implausible 800 mph tsunami.
Acting is a mixed bag. Bruce Davison delivers a standout performance as a Coast Guard captain, bringing charisma and gravitas to an otherwise lackluster cast. Van Dyke and Marie Westbrook, as the romantic leads, struggle with chemistry, and many supporting characters feel one-dimensional, leaving audiences indifferent to their fates. The dialogue is serviceable but uninspired, and the dark cinematography—described as “filmed in Darkovision”—obscures key action sequences, adding to the film’s chaotic feel.
Critics and audiences largely panned Titanic II. It holds a 15% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, with reviews calling it “so bad it’s good” for its unintentional humor. IMDb user reviews are scathing, with a 1.7/10 rating, citing “horrendous CG” and “woeful” acting. Some find it entertaining as a campy disaster flick, praising its absurdity for a “mindless Saturday afternoon.” However, others deem it a “must-miss,” criticizing its lack of originality and poor production values.
For fans of The Asylum’s deliberately trashy style, Titanic II offers some laugh-out-loud moments, like a door-crushing death scene or a poorly rendered turbine explosion. Yet, it fails to fully embrace its potential as a parody, leaving it in a limbo where it’s neither engagingly dramatic nor consistently funny. If you’re a disaster movie enthusiast who enjoys spotting continuity errors or reveling in low-budget chaos, it might be worth a watch. Otherwise, this ship sinks under its own weight.



0 Comments